I know that I personally never send the RAW files and instead send JPGs with the size and resolution dependent on the type of client. I have a P4P in addition to the EVO II 6K and I can tell you the P4P has been gathering dust since the day I bought the EVO mainly due to geofencing concerns. Even if you did hire the guy and he sent you the footage it is unlikely you would be able to tell what he used unless you specifically requested the RAW files in the contract which most people don't agree to or charge an extra fee for. If all three shot the same image and each image was post processed properly it would also be impossible to tell which was taken with which.Īs far as metadata goes, you can absolutely edit anything in the data, it is just editable fields that are in no way protected from being changed. Any of them are capable of producing commercially viable images and only pixel peepers would argue otherwise. I would say these days the Mavic 2 Pro, the EVO II 6K, and the P4P are all about the same since they all have the same sized sensor (in fact it may actually be the exact same Sony sensor but I have not researched this).

The actual gold standard for prosumer drones would be the I2 with the X7 camera but the more common (affordable) standard used to be the P4P.

Exif pilot pro